Queen: Hot Space - 1982
“Experimenting with some black, funk stuff whatever you call it darlings” - Freddie Mercury
Action This Day tried to merge rock with this white funk sound, pretty unsuccessfully. In an age nowadays when everyone is looking back retrospectively at Queen's career, very few are ever going to pick any of this material out to go on any compilations or playlists. It didn't fit in, culturally, in 1982 and it doesn't now either. The essence of Queen is certainly not to be found anywhere here. Incidentally, The Jackson 5 did a disco-funk track called Body Language back in 1975 on their Moving Violation album - an influence, maybe?
Released in 1982, before Queen’s “second coming” in 1984, Hot Space was a strange album. As Freddie Mercury told his audiences in live performances around 1981, the band were “experimenting with some black, funk stuff whatever you call it darlings..”. It was clumsy statement and indeed, this was a clumsy, self-conscious, almost embarrassing album.
Everyone had to dabble in disco-funk it seemed - The Rolling Stones, Elton John, David Bowie, ABBA, Rod Stewart - many had already tried it. Queen, in fact, were very late in getting around to it. The band that once proudly trumpeted the fact that nobody played synthesiser on their early albums now released an album absolutely awash with them. It all sounded a bit incongruous, however, not convincing either as funk or as disco. Some people loved it, however, notably Michael Jackson, who claimed it had a big influence on his creating the Thriller album. Queen were most definitely serious “old hat” in 1982. Punk had been and gone, and New Wave. Two Tone had peaked and New Romanticism was all the rage. What better, then to win people back than to produce an album of cod white funk?
Tracks like Staying Power, Back Chat, Body Language and Dancer are all tolerable enough but they are not the real thing, neither are they anywhere near as good as Queen’s previous funk outings - Another One Bites The Dust and Dragon Attack, for example. The old “side one” of this sort of thing is ok though and I suppose kudos must be given to them for trying to diversify. They gave it a go. It just didn’t really work, sadly. Look, I love funk, but too much clunky "Queen funk" is a another thing altogether.
“Side two” sees things go even more awry. Oh dear. Calling All Girls is positively fucking awful. Hold on, was that a Roger Taylor song? Well, there you go. The song about John Lennon, Life Is Real, was well meant enough, obviously, and it even sounds remarkably like it could have come from Mind Games but it just doesn't quite come off. Put Out the Fire is totally unmemorable.
Las Palabras De Amor is a big production number in a style that harks back to their mid-seventies pomp, however in 1982 it just sounded dated. I remember hearing it at the time and recalling my Queen fan days of 1975-76 and quite liking it, but at the same time realising how anachronistic it was.
Cool Cat is an interesting curio, I have to say. It doesn’t sound remotely like either Queen or Mercury. Actually, if you listen to this and try to forget it is Queen, it becomes more enjoyable. For me, it is the best track on the album, oddly. Mercury's voice is much higher pitched than usual and the whole feel is a very laid-back jazzy one.
The subsequent releases of the album have included the collaboration with David Bowie, Under Pressure, which was an enormous hit, of course. It sits somewhat uncomfortably with the rest of the album. It's great, as we all know, but doesn't really seem part of the album.
A non-album track from the sessions in this period (possibly dating back to The Game) was Soul Brother, a bluesy ballad a bit similar to Cool Cat. Mercury's voice also used the same high pitch. He wrote the song for Brian May, who, of course, contributes some great guitar to it. Also around were live cuts of Action This Day and Calling All Girls which are ok, sounding powerful enough and making you forget that they weren't really very good songs.


Was Under Pressure (yes it does seem incredibly out of place) always included as the last track? It would've made for quite a grim LP had it closed with Cool Cat. It's a guilty pleasure of mine, and major nostalgic value, so I can't stick up for it too much.
ReplyDeleteNo, it wasn't, just as it wasn't on original releases of Bowie's Let's Dance either. It shouldn't really be on Hot Space, but its presence makes it a more appealing album, obviously. Similarly, Virginia Plain was never on the first Roxy Music album.
DeleteI must disagree with you there Panther. Originally released as a single in October 1981, it was later included on Queen's 1982 album Hot Space as the closing track, and also never made it onto the Let's Dance album.
DeleteYou know, I think I have been deceived re: Under Pressure bnecause its presence was always so incongruous on Hot Space. I imagined it was originally never there!
DeleteI had a CD of Let's Dance with UP on it, though. Here it is -
https://www.discogs.com/release/816604-David-Bowie-Lets-Dance
Quite a token inclusion on that CD reissue. Let's Dance does not seem quite right if not finishing with the funk ditty that is Shake It.
DeleteYes, all these singles subsequently stuck on to albums don't quite seem right.
DeleteThe absolute worst offender of all is the US release of The Clash's debut album which has all sorts of chronologically irrelevant stuff on it, like I Fought The Law. Oh, and the US versions of Beatles albums, of course.
While I'm thinking of singles, another pet hate of mine are 7" single edits. I'm sure you have heard the crime against music that is the butchered version of Young Americans!
That Young Americans edit is a crime against humanity and worse so the brutal "Heroes" single edit that starts with the Dolphins line.
DeleteOh yes, I'd forgotten that one! Bloody awful. I'm very much a fan of full-length versions.
Delete